Last, but certainly far from least, is the replacement strut rods QA1 refers to as Dynamic Strut Bars (PN 52312, MSRP 219.95). The bars' greater cross-section also minimizes deflection under hard braking and lateral load. But probably the bar's most critical feature is its robust rod end. The OEM strut rod mounted in a pillow bushing strikes its own arc, which conflicts with the control arm's arc. The bind those arcs generate explain the premature bushing wear these cars suffer. But the bind never occurs because the rod end on the Dynamic Strut Bar pivots on the exact axis as the control arm.
That bind-free operation along with the more positive control arm location justifies QA1's decision to retain the lower control arm's more compliant rubber bushings. "When you get into components that have a higher durometer, more road imperfections can resonate through the body and get to the driver," Kass notes. "That's unwanted for a lot of people; they're not building a true race car."
Every bit as important as what these parts do is what they don't do. They do not modify the vehicle in any permanent way; the stock parts can be returned with nobody the wiser. Contrary to what their lighter visual appearance suggests, they don't reduce weight appreciably either. "About two months went into just finding ways to shave weight," Kass observes. Of course a weight-conscious and engineering-driven Chrysler gave QA1 quite a task. "We did (shed weight) in some places but we also found that if you take away a significant amount of weight some of that flex comes back. It doesn't make sense to pay for another piece just to get the same results as stock parts."
And beyond eliminating the lower control arm bind these parts don't alter the suspension geometry. It's an idea that puzzles some enthusiasts but QA1 says it has a good reason: The design doesn't need it. True, first-generation ponycars from the other manufacturers suffer positive camber curves and high roll centers. But just as GM did with its second-generation F-Body, Chrysler gave its 1971-and-later B-Body and 1970-and-later E-Body cars a pretty respectable negative camber curves and low roll centers. That's a happy coincidence; worthwhile suspension improvements usually require at least relocating the upper control arm mounting points, a tricky proposition in a car that locates those parts in integrated body components.
"But that doesn't mean [an enthusiast] can't improve handling," Kass maintains. "With these pieces a car is going to feel a lot more composed. [The] average street driver who goes to and from shows and does the occasional track time doesn't want a race car anyway."
Publishing constraints prevent us from getting real-world feedback (this K-member is one of the first two production pieces), but we expect to hear about it. This assembly went to Marty Sokulski, an avid autocross enthusiast who cut his teeth in the NASCAR AutoZone Elite Division (in fact, his team partner Howard Daffern works at Cascade Auto Clinic, the Redmond, Washington, shop that graciously donated shop time to the cause). He's one of a handful of people QA1 consulted during these products developments, and his structurally pristine '68 Charger served as one of the company's guinea pigs.
We may not have real-world feedback at this time, but we have the confidence that QA1 did its homework. After all, QA1 has a lot riding on these crossmember and suspension assemblies, and it knows how critical the enthusiast market is. Most importantly, QA1 also knows that the bolts that make it so easy to install this piece will come right back out if it doesn't perform to standards. But, according to the amount of thread-locker Sokulski used during the installation, we think he feels equally confident about the design.