An English major may disagree, but the way to spell "power" is "supercharger." Let's face it, the word just reeks of big horsepower numbers-and not without good reason. The basic definition of "super" is "more than," and in this instance, it implies charging a cylinder with "more air than" a normally aspirated cylinder would.
So much for a fundamental definition of what a supercharger does. Now let's pose a question that has a less-than-obvious answer. Why supercharge, why not just more cubes? The fact of the matter is that a piston/rod/crank system is very effective at taking a source of high-pressure gas and turning it into rotating mechanical energy at the end of the crankshaft. Such a mechanism is not only mechanically far more efficient than is often accredited, but is also relatively effective in terms of size and component weight necessary to do so. Nonetheless, it is far less capable of moving atmospheric air at just less than 15 psi absolute (pressure above a total vacuum) from outside of the engine to inside the cylinder. For this operation, a piston/rod/crank is a heavy, cumbersome mechanism in terms of component size for the mass of air induced. In essence, any supercharger of merit is, size for size, a far more effective means of moving significantly greater quantities of air than a piston/rod/crank system. If you want absolute proof of what is being said here, just check the size of a turbo compared to the engine it's feeding. A turbo of about one twentieth of the size of an engine can pass as much as four to five times the volume of air. By utilizing a supercharger of any type, we are in effect making the engine act as if it has far more cubes because the magnitude of the induction process is now determined by the supercharger, not the basic displacement of the long-block itself.
The Whipple Blower A casual look at the Whipple supercharger might lead you to the conclu
Supercharger TypesBasically, there are two fundamental types of superchargers: The positive-displacement type, and all the rest that are not. The best-known positive-displacement supercharger or blower is the Roots type. Originally developed in England by the Roots brothers to pump air into deep mine shafts during the middle of the 1800s, this type of pump started to see use on aircraft engines late in WWI. Although this style was successfully used between the wars on Mercedes and Auto Union F1 cars, and the highly successful British ERA F2 cars, they really came to the forefront when the likes of Don Garlits and a few other Top Fuel racers of the late 1950s and early 1960s figured they could go faster with a blower atop the motor-and they did. Back then, the blower of choice (because there was not a lot else to choose from) was the GMC supercharger used for supercharging GM's two-cycle diesel. The sizes most commonly used were the 6-71 and the 8-71. These big blowers could puff about 20-25 psi into a Chrysler Hemi and bump the output to what was then an incredible 2,500 or so horsepower, and about 3,200 lb-ft of torque. Today, we see many superchargers that owe their heritage to the GMC range of blowers. A few examples are those from Holley/Weiand, Edelbrock, Magnuson, I-Charger, BDS, Littlefield, and Eaton. When taking a casual look at this type of supercharger, it is easy to assume it draws the air into the middle of the rotors and passes it down into the manifold. In reality, this does not happen. The best way to see how it works is to look at a small-block Chevy oil pump, as this is in fact a mini Roots-type pump.
In its original form and right up through the late 1980s, the big drawback with the Roots blower was its relatively inefficient (about 55 percent) pumping characteristics. Here, substantial credit can be given to ace blower designer Jerry Magnuson; his efforts to improve the Roots-style positive-displacement blower have brought its efficiency throughout the typical operating range and duty cycle to a level closely comparable to a turbo-style supercharger. To put that into perspective, he has in the last 20 years done what engineers in the previous 120 years largely failed to do. Today, 98 percent or more of the superchargers sold have Magnuson technology in them. In other words, your modern Roots-style supercharger is not the one your father knew.
The Roots-type supercharger, though, is not the only positive-displacement style available. Among the many others in this category are the Zoller vane-type supercharger, the novel (and supposedly very efficient) VW G-Lader, and the Whipple-style screw compressor. Of these, only the Whipple unit, also a high-efficiency unit, is in any kind of aftermarket volume production.
The Magnuson Blower The simplest Roots superchargers are still very much like the Chevy o
Turbos And Centrifugal SuperchargersUnlike positive-displacement superchargers (which, barring leakage, move a certain amount of air per revolution), centrifugal superchargers develop boost by imparting motion into the air. When the air meets a resistance to this motion, the slowing of the air turns the kinetic energy into pressure energy. For that reason, the boost and airflow throughput of a turbine supercharger are very much interdependent on the characteristics of the engine it is feeding. About this moment, it's worth making a very pertinent point concerning boost. Most people think that a supercharger's whole existence is to develop boost, and as obvious as that may seem to be, it's not quite true. If the goal is the biggest boost number possible, then be aware that welding the intake valves closed will produce the highest boost, but not much power. The real job of a supercharger is to move the greatest mass of air through an engine, which then must subsequently use it effectively. A turbine supercharger can move a great deal of air very effectively. Also, since a centrifugal supercharger's mode of operation does not involve so much beating of the air, it can, when optimally designed, do so with high efficiency. But there is a downside: its speed sensitivity. As the turbine spins, the boost goes up with the square of the rpm. This means at low speed minimal boost, and at high speed possibly too much boost. Fortunately, a lot of work over the years by a bunch of smart engineers has brought about a number of moves that minimize this characteristic.
To see how the "too much upstairs and not enough low down" situation has been addressed, let us first look at a turbocharger installation. What we have here is an intake turbine driven by a shaft powered by a turbine fed via the engine's exhaust. In simple terms, the exhaust energy is driving the intake compressor turbine. The general principle is to size the intake turbine such that it is a little too big for the job at high speed. This means it starts to boost the engine sooner, but if left to its own devices, would provide too much boost at high speed. To prevent this, the exhaust side has an exhaust wastegate. When the boost reaches a certain predetermined level, the wastegate opens and bypasses any excess exhaust beyond what is needed. Along with impeller design, this characteristic and the inlet sizing helps spread a turbo's boost range down into the lower rpm band.