Popular Hot Rodding Magazine Homepage Popular Hot Rodding
Get Adobe Flash player

Pontiac Trans Am vs. Ford Mustang vs. Dodge Challenger - Pony Express!

Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 2 Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 3 Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 4
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 5
The interior remains mostly... 
   
  read full caption
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 5
The interior remains mostly stock. The only tweaks are a set of Procar seats, and Auto Meter water and oil temp gauges mounted on the steering column. In order to avoid cutting the floor, the motor was angled upward so that the TKO trans would clear the trans tunnel.
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 6
To stiffen up the chassis,... 
   
  read full caption
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 6
To stiffen up the chassis, Advanced Performance (Hesperia, CA) built custom shock tower braces and subframe connectors. The two-tone paint scheme carries over into the engine bay where the silver paint really makes the motor pop.
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 7
In lieu of vinyl, the graphics... 
   
  read full caption
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 7
In lieu of vinyl, the graphics and silver stripe were painted on. The suspension has been beefed up with Global West front control arms. At the corners, it utilizes Mustang Plus drop springs and KYB shocks.
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 8 Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 9 Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 10
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 11
By pulling molds off of the... 
   
  read full caption
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 11
By pulling molds off of the stock steel hood, 1st Class Auto Body (Hesperia, CA) was able to make a fiberglass replica. Between it, the heater and A/C delete, and removing the heavy plastic bumpers, Bruce took 300 pounds out of the car. It now weighs 3,420 pounds.
Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 12 Trans Am Vs Mustang Vs Challenger 1973 Ford Mustang 13
BY THE NUMBERS
'73 FORD MUSTANG
Bruce Wasserburger, 75 * Hesperia, CA
ENGINE
Type: Ford 411ci Cleveland small-block
Block: factory Ford bored to 4.040 inches
Rotating assembly: Eagle 4.000-inch forged
crank and 6.00-inch steel rods;
CP 10.7:1 pistons
Cylinder heads: factory Cleveland castings
with 2.08/1.65-inch Manley valves,
heads ported to flow 325 cfm
Camshaft: Comp 269/276-at-0.050 solid roller,
0.670/0.670-inch lift, 108-degree LSA
Induction: Edelbrock Torker single-plane intake manifold,
Holley 750-cfm carb
Exhaust: Thorley 1¾-inch long-tube headers,
dual 3-inch Flowmaster mufflers

DRIVETRAIN
Transmission: Tremec TKO
five-speed manual,
Hurst shifter,
McLeod billet steel
flywheel and clutch
Rear axle: Ford 9-inch rearend,
28-spline axles, 4.11:1 gears,
Auburn limited-slip differential

WHEELS & TIRES
Wheels: American Racing Hopster
15x8, front; 16x10, rear
Tires: Hoosier 26x7.50x15, front;
Mickey Thompson 27x11x16 slicks, rear


Prev | 1  | 2  | 3  | Next

Discuss in our Forums
Ford Shelby GT500 Research
Ford Shelby GT500 Read detailed reviews on the all new Ford Shelby GT500 and compare it with other vehicles you may be thinking of buying. The 2010 Shelby GT500 has fuel economy of 18 mpg and can seat 4 people comfortably. The Ford Fusion and the Cadillac Sts are other vehicles that might interest you.

Related Hot Rod Pictures

More Related Content